Injured? Real Law. Real Answers.
Describe what happened. Get answers backed by real statutes and court opinions.
Informational only — not legal advice. No attorney–client relationship. Don't share confidential details.
Hey — tell me what happened, and I'll help you understand your legal options.
Pick a question below to get started, or just describe your situation in your own words.
Free. Backed by real statutes and court opinions.
How it works
Three steps from question to clarity.
Ask your question in plain English
No legal jargon needed. Describe your situation the way you'd explain it to a friend.
Our AI searches thousands of statutes and rulings
Our retrieval engine searches U.S. case law, federal and state statutes, and legal precedents. No Wikipedia. No blog posts. No guessing.
Get a cited answer you can verify yourself
Every response includes the exact statute or case it's based on. Click through to the source. Check our work.
Why Find Legal Help?
Built differently. Built better.
Real Citations
Every answer points to the specific statute, case, or regulation it's based on. Not a summary. Not a paraphrase. The actual source.
Private by Design
Your questions are processed and discarded. No accounts required. No data sold. No third-party APIs. We don't store what you ask.
Built on Primary Sources
Our retrieval engine is trained on U.S. case law and statutory databases — not scraped web pages. The same sources attorneys use, made searchable in plain English.
Unlike ChatGPT, we know the law.
General-purpose AI chatbots invent fake cases, fabricate statutes, and fold the moment you question them. Lawyers are getting sanctioned for trusting them. Here's the record.
AI hallucination cases went from 2 per week to 2-3 per day in 2025.
Morgan & Morgan
2025No. 42 largest law firm in America. Filed ChatGPT-generated fake case citations in a Walmart lawsuit.
MyPillow attorneys
2025Two attorneys filed a brief stuffed with hallucinated cases in a federal defamation case.
LA appellate attorney
202521 of 23 case quotations in his brief were completely fabricated by ChatGPT.
Colorado attorney
2025Texted his paralegal admitting he "like an idiot" didn't check ChatGPT's work.
Generic AI Chatbot
"Under Iowa law, you may be entitled to compensation under the Personal Injury Recovery Act..."
This statute doesn't exist.
"Actually, I don't think that's right."
"You're absolutely right, I apologize for the confusion! Let me correct that..."
Abandons correct answer when challenged.
Find Legal Help
"Under Iowa Code § 668.3, contributory fault shall not bar recovery if you are less than 51% at fault."
View on Iowa Legislature"Actually, I don't think that's right."
"Here's the statute text — § 668.3 specifically states that contributory fault shall not bar recovery..."
Cites the actual law. Doesn't fold.
What we're building
Legal information is public. It belongs to everyone. But in practice, it's locked behind $200/month subscriptions and $500/hour consultations — not because the law is secret, but because nobody can find the right provision in millions of pages.
Find Legal Help is a retrieval engine purpose-built for legal text. We don't generate legal opinions. We find the specific statute, case, or regulation that answers your question — and we show you exactly where it came from.
Our approach
Specialized retrieval
Most legal AI tools are general-purpose language models with a legal prompt. We built a specialized retrieval system trained specifically on U.S. case law and statutory databases.
Source-first architecture
Every answer traces back to an actual source, not a statistical prediction of what the law probably says. Retrieval-first means verifiability.
Privacy by default
Questions are processed and discarded. No accounts. No tracking. No data retention. We can't leak what we don't keep.